Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

WiKirby:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
#Now that opening was expanded (and is quite lenghty), I support the nomination for reasons outlined above by PYF. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#Now that opening was expanded (and is quite lenghty), I support the nomination for reasons outlined above by PYF. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#I also support for all the same reasons as above. Looks like all needed info is present, including relevant images. Per all. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 19:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#I also support for all the same reasons as above. Looks like all needed info is present, including relevant images. Per all. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 19:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#I suppose it will do now that the opening abstract has been expanded. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 22:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#I suppose it will do now that the opening abstract has been extended. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 22:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}
{{Oppose}}
<s>The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)</s>
<s>The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)</s>
<s>For the time being, I agree with Superbound. The beginning paragraph needs to be extended before we feature it. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)</s>
<s><br>For the time being, I agree with Superbound. The beginning paragraph needs to be extended before we feature it. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)</s></br>
{{Neutral}}
{{Neutral}}
#Just checking in to let you guys know that I fixed the issue addressed by the opposition. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 18:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
#Just checking in to let you guys know that I fixed the issue addressed by the opposition. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 18:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 18 November 2020


Current Nominations

Popstar (November 4, 2020 - November 18, 2020)

A good, fairly long page about an important location to the series. Need I say more? ---PinkYoshiFan 23:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Support
  1. Seems like it fits the bill. I don't really see anything important missing from the article, and it's got a healthy-sized gallery to boot. --Samwell (talk) 03:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
  2. Now that opening was expanded (and is quite lenghty), I support the nomination for reasons outlined above by PYF. Superbound (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  3. I also support for all the same reasons as above. Looks like all needed info is present, including relevant images. Per all. – Owencrazyboy17 (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  4. I suppose it will do now that the opening abstract has been extended. -- Jellytost (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Oppose

The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. Superbound (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
For the time being, I agree with Superbound. The beginning paragraph needs to be extended before we feature it. -- Jellytost (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Neutral
  1. Just checking in to let you guys know that I fixed the issue addressed by the opposition. --Samwell (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Samwell. Superbound (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination Archive

Featured Articles
Failed Nominations