Automoderated users, autopatrol, Moderators, patroller
15,923
edits
Superbound (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
#This one only has 1 construction notice, but that's still bad, and there is, of course, rule 5. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | #This one only has 1 construction notice, but that's still bad, and there is, of course, rule 5. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | ||
#Construction means the article is incomplete. Incomplete articles should not be considered featured, because they do not reflect the wiki's best. Supporting its removal. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | #Construction means the article is incomplete. Incomplete articles should not be considered featured, because they do not reflect the wiki's best. Supporting its removal. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. [[User:Superbound|Superbound]] ([[User talk:Superbound|talk]]) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
#Yes. It has 2 construction notices, which is probably not a good think for a featured article. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | #Yes. It has 2 construction notices, which is probably not a good think for a featured article. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | ||
#See my vote on Waddle Doo, but it's even worse here. Definitely not a good pick for featurement, and it baffles me how this was ever deemed good. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | #See my vote on Waddle Doo, but it's even worse here. Definitely not a good pick for featurement, and it baffles me how this was ever deemed good. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. [[User:Superbound|Superbound]] ([[User talk:Superbound|talk]]) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} |