WiKirby talk:Editor-in-Chief/draft

Length of Term

Should the position be annually elected or only done "as needed"? Tacopill (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

1. I'd say as needed. ---PinkYoshiFan 23:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
2. As needed. Having yearly elections would invite campaigning, which I find distasteful for a wiki. --Samwell (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
3. I would say either way works, but I have a small lean towards it being as needed. - Gigi (talk • edits) 23:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
4. Probably as needed. I don't mind yearly election, but it creates an odd situation where the EiC would only have the option to quit every year, which undermines the principle of volunteer work. I'm in no rush to retire from the position, of course, but we probably don't need yearly election here at least as of now. --YFJ (talk · edits) 23:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Position Requirements

Should being nominated be restricted to admins and above, patroller and above, open to all? Tacopill (talk) 23:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

1. Admins+ only. They are the ones with the most experience with the wiki. --Samwell (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
2. Admins+ only is also my preferred option, for the same reason as Samwell. - Gigi (talk • edits) 23:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)