Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

Talk:Lololo: Difference between revisions

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
*>Isevijod
No edit summary
(Undo revision 11675 by Isevijod (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
----
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
----
=[http://ebytery.co.cc Under Construction! Please Visit Reserve Page. Page Will Be Available Shortly]=
----
=[http://ebytery.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
----
</div>
==Seperate Article==
==Seperate Article==
Why is this a seperate article from [[Lololo &amp; Lalala]], just for the one battle where Lololo appears on his own? And despite the text at the top claiming that the article is about that battle, it actually appears to be about the character in general, as it covers his appearances together with Lalala as well (it even claims he "always" appears with Lalala). Should this redirect to the aforementioned Lololo &amp; Lalala article, which already covers the character?--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 20:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Why is this a seperate article from [[Lololo & Lalala]], just for the one battle where Lololo appears on his own? And despite the text at the top claiming that the article is about that battle, it actually appears to be about the character in general, as it covers his appearances together with Lalala as well (it even claims he "always" appears with Lalala). Should this redirect to the aforementioned Lololo & Lalala article, which already covers the character?--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 20:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
:Since the one battle he appears in alone is mentioned (in more detail!) in [[Lololo &amp; Lalala]], this separate article does seem redundant. Not so sure the top section's supposed to mean the article's about that one battle, but as I said, it's more detailed at [[Lololo &amp; Lalala]]. I say redirect, unless there's going to be enough information about Lololo to validate a separate article. [[User:Moydow|&lt;font color="green">Moy&lt;/font>]][[User talk:Moydow|&lt;font color="orange">dow&lt;/font>]] 20:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
:Since the one battle he appears in alone is mentioned (in more detail!) in [[Lololo & Lalala]], this separate article does seem redundant. Not so sure the top section's supposed to mean the article's about that one battle, but as I said, it's more detailed at [[Lololo & Lalala]]. I say redirect, unless there's going to be enough information about Lololo to validate a separate article. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 20:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
::As far as I'm aware, Lololo practically never appears without Lalala apart from that one battle in a single game, and the characters are basically portrayed as a male and a female version of the same character in the Anime, so I doubt there is ever going to be enough unique information on Lololo to warrant a seperate page when there's already an article on the duo; keeping an article on one particular appearance of a character when said character is already covered elsewhere seems like a pointless split-up of information to me. The Lalala article has already been redirected to [[Lololo &amp; Lalala]] as well, so this probably makes more sense as a redirect there too; if anyone can name a good reason why this seperate article is needed though, feel free to revert.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 15:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
::As far as I'm aware, Lololo practically never appears without Lalala apart from that one battle in a single game, and the characters are basically portrayed as a male and a female version of the same character in the Anime, so I doubt there is ever going to be enough unique information on Lololo to warrant a seperate page when there's already an article on the duo; keeping an article on one particular appearance of a character when said character is already covered elsewhere seems like a pointless split-up of information to me. The Lalala article has already been redirected to [[Lololo & Lalala]] as well, so this probably makes more sense as a redirect there too; if anyone can name a good reason why this seperate article is needed though, feel free to revert.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 15:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:33, 24 November 2010

Seperate Article

Why is this a seperate article from Lololo & Lalala, just for the one battle where Lololo appears on his own? And despite the text at the top claiming that the article is about that battle, it actually appears to be about the character in general, as it covers his appearances together with Lalala as well (it even claims he "always" appears with Lalala). Should this redirect to the aforementioned Lololo & Lalala article, which already covers the character?--Vellidragon 20:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Since the one battle he appears in alone is mentioned (in more detail!) in Lololo & Lalala, this separate article does seem redundant. Not so sure the top section's supposed to mean the article's about that one battle, but as I said, it's more detailed at Lololo & Lalala. I say redirect, unless there's going to be enough information about Lololo to validate a separate article. Moydow 20:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, Lololo practically never appears without Lalala apart from that one battle in a single game, and the characters are basically portrayed as a male and a female version of the same character in the Anime, so I doubt there is ever going to be enough unique information on Lololo to warrant a seperate page when there's already an article on the duo; keeping an article on one particular appearance of a character when said character is already covered elsewhere seems like a pointless split-up of information to me. The Lalala article has already been redirected to Lololo & Lalala as well, so this probably makes more sense as a redirect there too; if anyone can name a good reason why this seperate article is needed though, feel free to revert.--Vellidragon 15:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)