|
|
| (272 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. --> | | <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. -->__NOTOC__{{FARules}} |
| __NOTOC__ | |
| {{FARules}} | |
|
| |
|
| = '''Current Nominations''' = | | = '''Current Nominations'''= |
| =='''[[Kirby (anime character)]]''' (February 2nd, 2021 - February 16th, 2021) ==
| | ''None at the moment.'' |
| [[Kirby]] in the games is featured, so why not feature his anime counterpart as well? The article is very well-written, and has a mighty gallery to go along with it. I say it deserves to be featured. How about you all? -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 09:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| {{Support}}
| |
| #L<s>G</s>FTM. There are currently no problem tags present, and documentation is sufficient. --[[User:pandakekok9|pandakekok9]] ([[User talk:pandakekok9|poyo]]) 10:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #I've no issue supporting this nomination. It meets all technical qualifications, so whether or not it gives Kirby 2 weeks on the page is insubstantial, imo. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 05:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #As Samwell said, it meets all qualifications, and is there any reason not to give the <i>reason for our wiki's existence</i> more time to shine? {{User:Pinkyoshifan/sig}} 16:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Oppose}}
| |
| #A few episodes and characters are already featured, and virtually all link to this article so it's not going to be unseen. To say something is lacking, it is not, but since the same character from games is featured I find it unnecessary that Kirby takes 2 weeks on the main page. —[[User:Viperision|Viperision]] ([[User talk:Viperision|talk]]) 09:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #Personally, I would agree with Viper above. Kirby has had his time in the spotlight already, and I agree that it's easy to see the anime Kirby from previously featured episodes and articles pertaining to the anime. So for me, I would oppose. [[User:Hexelectron|Hexelectron]] ([[User talk:Hexelectron|talk]]) 05:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)\
| |
| #First of all '''''I strongly disagree with Hexelectron, pandakekok, Pinkyoshifan, Samwell and Viperision.''''' What article is on the front page is secondary reason to support nomination and should not take priority over article itself. Additionally, the article is lacking, I didn't learn anything about what Kirby does in these episodes. Does he defeats King Dedede? Maybe he just eats food? Who knows, the only way to find out is to check '''''100''''' different pages and read plot summaries hoping to quickly find what you look for. Something a lá what MetaDragon is currently [https://wikirby.com/w/index.php?title=User:MetaDragon/Sandbox&action=edit§ion=4 working in her Sandbox] ([[Special:PermaLink/205722|permalink, check ''Kirby'' (Mie Takase) section]]) might work, and be preferably be applied to other anime characters pages. Alternatively split it into subsections like [[Waddle Dee (anime)]] for primary appearances only (could be useful for less important characters).
| |
| #:'''Too long; didn't read; but I should''': Page is good, but there are other pages (also marked as Good), which are better quality and simply doesn't match the level of other featured articles. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 21:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Neutral}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == '''Nomination Archive''' == | | == '''Nomination Archive''' == |
