|
|
| (275 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. --> | | <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. -->__NOTOC__{{FARules}} |
| __NOTOC__ | |
| {{FARules}} | |
|
| |
|
| = '''Current Nominations''' = | | = '''Current Nominations'''= |
| =='''[[Kirby (anime)]]''' (February 2nd, 2021 - February 16th, 2021) ==
| | ''None at the moment.'' |
| [[Kirby]] in the games is featured, so why not feature his anime counterpart as well? The article is very well-written, and has a mighty gallery to go along with it. I say it deserves to be featured. How about you all? -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 09:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| {{Support}}
| |
| #L<s>G</s>FTM. There are currently no problem tags present, and documentation is sufficient. --[[User:pandakekok9|pandakekok9]] ([[User talk:pandakekok9|poyo]]) 10:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #I've no issue supporting this nomination. It meets all technical qualifications, so whether or not it gives Kirby 2 weeks on the page is insubstantial, imo. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 05:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #As Samwell said, it meets all qualifications, and is there any reason not to give the <i>reason for our wiki's existence</i> more time to shine? {{User:Pinkyoshifan/sig}} 16:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Oppose}}
| |
| #A few episodes and characters are already featured, and virtually all link to this article so it's not going to be unseen. To say something is lacking, it is not, but since the same character from games is featured I find it unnecessary that Kirby takes 2 weeks on the main page. —[[User:Viperision|Viperision]] ([[User talk:Viperision|talk]]) 09:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #Personally, I would agree with Viper above. Kirby has had his time in the spotlight already, and I agree that it's easy to see the anime Kirby from previously featured episodes and articles pertaining to the anime. So for me, I would oppose. [[User:Hexelectron|Hexelectron]] ([[User talk:Hexelectron|talk]]) 05:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Neutral}}
| |
| | |
| =='''''[[Kirby's Avalanche]]''''' (February 1, 2021 - February 15, 2021)==
| |
| This page has had a ''MASSIVE'' amount of work done on it (extremely) recently to make it Good, and it deserves to be featured for the quality of the page, even if the game itself isn't similar quality. {{User:Pinkyoshifan/sig}} 23:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Support}}
| |
| #We're gonna have quite the backlog of featured articles if we keep up at this rate, but sure. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 23:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #I might have started the rewrite-expansion process but the end result looks so well polished! It deserves to be listed on our front page every-so-often. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 00:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #I support this. With all the polishing, it will do great on the main page. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 00:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| #I rather like ''Kirby's Avalanche''! It's not a bad game, just a little cheesy. But yeah, I support featuring it, since with the work we all did, it looks really good now. [[User:StrawberryChan|StrawberryChan]] ([[User talk:StrawberryChan|talk]]) 01:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| {{Oppose}}
| |
| {{Neutral}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == '''Nomination Archive''' == | | == '''Nomination Archive''' == |
