Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
WiKirby:Proposals: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Current Proposals: You do not have 100 edits yet.) |
|||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
#I agree. There are definitely pages out there that don't need a second paragraph but deserve to be featured articles. --[[User:JRJ007|JRJ007]] ([[User talk:JRJ007|talk]]) 01:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | #I agree. There are definitely pages out there that don't need a second paragraph but deserve to be featured articles. --[[User:JRJ007|JRJ007]] ([[User talk:JRJ007|talk]]) 01:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Lending my support. I think an abstract isn't always necessary if the details can be better covered in the main article. [[User:StrawberryChan|StrawberryChan]] ([[User talk:StrawberryChan|talk]]) 20:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | #Lending my support. I think an abstract isn't always necessary if the details can be better covered in the main article. [[User:StrawberryChan|StrawberryChan]] ([[User talk:StrawberryChan|talk]]) 20:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
#I support this proposal. After all, one of the writing policies states "Short articles and/or sections aren't bad if there's not much to talk about." Two policies shouldn't contradict each other, and I don't think length should be a requirement. {{User:Cowguy/sig}} 01:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
