Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
Talk:Kirby's Dream Land: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
*>Jimbo Jambo No edit summary |
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::Once again, it's not just because of the similarity, it's the fact that they replace other enemies after completion of a relatively short game. If Floaty had the sole role of replacing Kirby's parasol in a single game, then it might apply, but there is no real analogy. | ::::Once again, it's not just because of the similarity, it's the fact that they replace other enemies after completion of a relatively short game. If Floaty had the sole role of replacing Kirby's parasol in a single game, then it might apply, but there is no real analogy. | ||
::::The reason I'm suggesting this is for ease of navigation and to keep relevant information together. If someone searches for...Wizzer, the beam-firing scallop enemy, chances are they also want to know about Peezer, the crab enemy that replaces it, and about how they differ. It doesn't make sense to me to force them to jump to another page just to find out that the crab fires beams faster than the scallop. I don't see how anyone benefits from being fed redundant information covered up with creative writing and flavor text. Not trying to shove it down your throat, but do you at least see where I'm coming from? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 18:27, 22 October 2010 (CDT) | ::::The reason I'm suggesting this is for ease of navigation and to keep relevant information together. If someone searches for...Wizzer, the beam-firing scallop enemy, chances are they also want to know about Peezer, the crab enemy that replaces it, and about how they differ. It doesn't make sense to me to force them to jump to another page just to find out that the crab fires beams faster than the scallop. I don't see how anyone benefits from being fed redundant information covered up with creative writing and flavor text. Not trying to shove it down your throat, but do you at least see where I'm coming from? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 18:27, 22 October 2010 (CDT) | ||
:::::I do see where you're coming from, but I don't think it should be done mainly for consistency reasons in the way articles are dealt with. As you stated yourself, enemies like [[Tookey]] would still need a seperate article, and I think it would just be confusing for half of the enemies to have their own articles while the rest don't for no immediately apparent reason. Also, you can't assume that everyone who looks up an enemy wants to know about its Extra Game equivalent, especially with enemies like [[Bronto Burt]] that appear in multiple games, and if they ''do'' want to know about them, that's what links are for. Based on assumptions like that, we could as well get rid of links entirely and put the information from all otherwise linked to articles into a single one as there's a chance that people will want to read about those subjects as well.<br/>Furthermore, if we, for instance, cover Peezer in the Wizzer article, that also brings up the question how Wizzer is apparently more important than Peezer, seeing how it gets its own article while Peezer does not (but Tookey, for example, does). It doesn't seem like anything that would immediately be evident & make sense to the average reader coming here with no pre-knowledge, so it doesn't seem a very good idea from an organisational point of view.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 18:49, 22 October 2010 (CDT) | |||
