Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
WiKirby talk:Editor-in-Chief/draft: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Trig Jegman (talk | contribs) m (→AEIC) |
Trig Jegman (talk | contribs) m (→AEIC: smooth one trig) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
::Proportionally speaking, there is a high amount of Crats to active users on this site, the possible introduction of more seems unnecessary. SmashWiki sees drastically more people on its site and it only has 3 crats. More higher level staff is not necessary as long as the current ones remain somewhat active. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | ::Proportionally speaking, there is a high amount of Crats to active users on this site, the possible introduction of more seems unnecessary. SmashWiki sees drastically more people on its site and it only has 3 crats. More higher level staff is not necessary as long as the current ones remain somewhat active. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
==I've been thinking about it | ==I've been thinking about it== | ||
Yeah, truth be told I am not fond of the entire set-up here because it just seems wholly unnecessary. I think just because a system failed on a presumably (though I could be wrong) less popular wiki doesn't mean that a system needs to be imposed on every wiki there is. Wikirby is significantly active and there is an open flow of communication from both users and staff that if something were to happen that there would be ways around it. If things lessened, we could immediately look to new alternatives. I don't think I could say the same for something like Wikibound, which is lucky to see any more than ten edits a week, and without a significant head of the program active (current EIC hasn't made an edit since September of last year). I think the EIC yearly election or fill in standard really only needs to be done on wikis that don't have a terribly active base and/or with fewer than 2 crats active. Thats just my opinion, at the least, but I again just do not see the point in creating another whole system to learn, manage, and deal with probably ''maybe'' once in the next forseeable 3 years. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]]. - 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | Yeah, truth be told I am not fond of the entire set-up here because it just seems wholly unnecessary. I think just because a system failed on a presumably (though I could be wrong) less popular wiki doesn't mean that a system needs to be imposed on every wiki there is. Wikirby is significantly active and there is an open flow of communication from both users and staff that if something were to happen that there would be ways around it. If things lessened, we could immediately look to new alternatives. I don't think I could say the same for something like Wikibound, which is lucky to see any more than ten edits a week, and without a significant head of the program active (current EIC hasn't made an edit since September of last year). I think the EIC yearly election or fill in standard really only needs to be done on wikis that don't have a terribly active base and/or with fewer than 2 crats active. Thats just my opinion, at the least, but I again just do not see the point in creating another whole system to learn, manage, and deal with probably ''maybe'' once in the next forseeable 3 years. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]]. - 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
