WiKirby talk:Editor-in-Chief/draft: Difference between revisions

Line 38: Line 38:
I think AEiC would create even more Rank separation, and we should simplify it down. Being the only other active bureaucrat, Samwell is basically already that. In case of extended (complete) inactivity without a notice or a clear declaration of stepping down, the wiki owner should hold a new EiC election. No AEiC needed - it's basically EiC deciding who should automatically become one without new elections. WiKirby won't go on fire in these short infrequent EiC-less time frames. —[[User:Viperision|Viperision]] ([[User talk:Viperision|talk]]) 06:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I think AEiC would create even more Rank separation, and we should simplify it down. Being the only other active bureaucrat, Samwell is basically already that. In case of extended (complete) inactivity without a notice or a clear declaration of stepping down, the wiki owner should hold a new EiC election. No AEiC needed - it's basically EiC deciding who should automatically become one without new elections. WiKirby won't go on fire in these short infrequent EiC-less time frames. —[[User:Viperision|Viperision]] ([[User talk:Viperision|talk]]) 06:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
:I agree with Viper. Having an AEiC would create unneeded rank complexity since Samwell - and possibly other active Bureaucrats in the future - already serves as a sort of AEiC. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 07:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
:I agree with Viper. Having an AEiC would create unneeded rank complexity since Samwell - and possibly other active Bureaucrats in the future - already serves as a sort of AEiC. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 07:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
::Per Viperision, the AEiC position seems a bit uneeded. {{User:Pinkyoshifan/sig}} 12:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)