4,721
edits
WiKirby:Proposals: Difference between revisions
→Change featured article requirement 3 (February 7, 2020 - February 21, 2020): support
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
#I support this proposal. After all, one of the writing policies states "Short articles and/or sections aren't bad if there's not much to talk about." Two policies shouldn't contradict each other, and I don't think length should be a requirement. {{User:Cowguy/sig}} 01:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | #I support this proposal. After all, one of the writing policies states "Short articles and/or sections aren't bad if there's not much to talk about." Two policies shouldn't contradict each other, and I don't think length should be a requirement. {{User:Cowguy/sig}} 01:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Agree with literally everyone else for this particular proposal. Similar to what Cowguy said, short articles do not automatically mean they're bad. Sometimes there's not much to talk about, so trying to add more information would just be unnecessary fluff. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 01:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | #Agree with literally everyone else for this particular proposal. Similar to what Cowguy said, short articles do not automatically mean they're bad. Sometimes there's not much to talk about, so trying to add more information would just be unnecessary fluff. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 01:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
#I agree. If an article is good, it's good enough to qualify. This will allow for more diversity for featured articles. It would get boring if it were only the most popular things, like [[Kirby]], [[Meta Knight]], [[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate]] for featured articles. [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 00:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||