Automoderated users, autopatrol, Moderators, patroller
2,427
edits
WiKirby:Proposals: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Basic Person (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#Primary (and only) choice. Not just because the attack tables would be better off for the character but also because of a potential problem regarding bosses exclusive to circumstances like The Ultimate Choice. More details in the Discussion section. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 23:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | #Primary (and only) choice. Not just because the attack tables would be better off for the character but also because of a potential problem regarding bosses exclusive to circumstances like The Ultimate Choice. More details in the Discussion section. – [[User:Owencrazyboy17|Owencrazyboy17]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy17|talk]]) 23:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
#Single choice here. As stated, this ''is'' the boss character we're talking about, so it wouldn't make as much sense to put the move-set where the boss appears when the boss has its own page.--[[User:Paistrie|Paistrie]] ([[User talk:Paistrie|talk]]) 16:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | #Single choice here. As stated, this ''is'' the boss character we're talking about, so it wouldn't make as much sense to put the move-set where the boss appears when the boss has its own page.--[[User:Paistrie|Paistrie]] ([[User talk:Paistrie|talk]]) 16:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
#It makes far more sense to me to list all the moves on one page given that boss moves tend to evolve over time. We could easily use an <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> on stage pages to link to the move listing page wherever that is. {{User:Basic Person/sig}} 19:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
===Option 3: make no changes=== | ===Option 3: make no changes=== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
#Supporting. Spelling is definitely something some people have strong opinions and preferences, even when both options are correct, so having a policy like that to prevent arguments is good. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 19:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | #Supporting. Spelling is definitely something some people have strong opinions and preferences, even when both options are correct, so having a policy like that to prevent arguments is good. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 19:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
#I think this is a good thing to clarify. That said, I should warn you now that this likely will not stop certain users from insisting that certain things (like the Oxford comma situation) are ''correct'', so it probably won't stop most edit wars on these grounds. At the very least, it gives the admins firmer ground, so supporting regardless. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 19:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | #I think this is a good thing to clarify. That said, I should warn you now that this likely will not stop certain users from insisting that certain things (like the Oxford comma situation) are ''correct'', so it probably won't stop most edit wars on these grounds. At the very least, it gives the admins firmer ground, so supporting regardless. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 19:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
#I concur with those above about this subject. However, I feel as though the current proposed message could be a bit more descriptive and outright include some along the lines of: "No minor wording changes" just to be more specific and clear. {{User:Basic Person/sig}} 19:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||