WiKirby:Interwiki policy: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


== Layout copying ==
== Layout copying ==
Verbatim copying is not the same as research reading. (Example; A user reads an article at Wikipedia, and likes the section layout and basic structure. He/she writes a new article at WiKirby and (consciously or otherwise) employ a similar basic layout while composing the text. There is no issue here.) Layouts do not constitute original thinking or creative output, so are free to be replicated or adapted.
Verbatim copying is not the same as research reading. (For example, a user reads an article at Wikipedia, and likes the section layout and basic structure. This user writes a new article at WiKirby and (consciously or otherwise) employs a similar basic layout while composing the text. There is no issue here.) Layouts do not constitute original thinking or creative output, so are free to be replicated or adapted.


Also, it's important to take account of the idea of convergent thinking. Take two individuals with knowledge of a subject, tell them to write about a given topic in isolation, using the same encyclopedic tone and style, and it's likely that the resultant texts will have similarities. Presenting a given set of facts in a fixed style will naturally produce similar results.
Also, it's important to take account of the idea of convergent thinking. Take two individuals with knowledge of a subject, tell them to write about a given topic in isolation, using the same encyclopedic tone and style, and it's likely that the resultant texts will have similarities. Presenting a given set of facts in a fixed style will naturally produce similar results.