WiKirby:Proposals: Difference between revisions

Line 20: Line 20:
{{Support}}
{{Support}}
#I very much agree with this. I have had a decent amount of confusion reading some articles due to the names not being consistent. As for the anime, I feel like this would especially help those (like me) who have never watched the Japanese sub and would save time so they do not need to look up whatever it is that they are confused about.  {{User:Starvoid/sig}} 14:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
#I very much agree with this. I have had a decent amount of confusion reading some articles due to the names not being consistent. As for the anime, I feel like this would especially help those (like me) who have never watched the Japanese sub and would save time so they do not need to look up whatever it is that they are confused about.  {{User:Starvoid/sig}} 14:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
#This seems reasonable—as an extreme supporting example, you wouldn't leave an entity un-named when discussing it in the context of a specific game if that entity got a consistent name in later games. Any context short of literally quoting from the instruction manual or strategy guide should simply have a parenthetical aside or footnote about the original name, and move on using whatever name is (or would be) used for the article for that entity based on the wiki naming policy. {{User:WillIdleAway/sig}} 15:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}
{{Oppose}}
{{Neutral}}
{{Neutral}}
Automoderated users, autopatrol, patroller
2,706

edits