596
edits
Talk:Nature Notch - Stage 1: Difference between revisions
m
→Dispute
No edit summary |
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) m (→Dispute) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The wording that I changed ("[Kirby] will be in hot pursuit by Spinni") is extremely grammatically awkward, if not flat-out incorrect… so I don't understand the rationale behind reverting it at all. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) | The wording that I changed ("[Kirby] will be in hot pursuit by Spinni") is extremely grammatically awkward, if not flat-out incorrect… so I don't understand the rationale behind reverting it at all. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Alright, I guess this is how things are meant to be done when editors disagree. From what I understand, the way I phrased it originally is grammatically correct, but you seem to claim otherwise. Perhaps you could explain to me why you believe it isn't? Also, just for future reference, you're not supposed to revert a revert before starting the dispute. That's meant to happen after the dispute is resolved, should it be decided in your favor. It's fine this time, but please keep that in mind going forward. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC) | :Alright, I guess this is how things are meant to be done when editors disagree. From what I understand, the way I phrased it originally is grammatically correct, but you seem to claim otherwise. Perhaps you could explain to me why you believe it isn't? Also, just for future reference, you're not supposed to revert a revert before starting the dispute. That's meant to happen after the dispute is resolved, should it be decided in your favor. It's fine this time, but please keep that in mind going forward. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
::I reverted the revert ''after'' declaring the dispute, since I knew in advance that the reversion would implicitly be declaring a dispute anyways. As for the dispute itself, "be in hot pursuit by X" is not grammatically coherent. "…with X in hot pursuit" would be the preferred arrangement, but I don't think that would work here, so I used a different word choice that would work within the rest of the sentence as written. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 00:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) | |||