Template talk:Infobox-Enemy: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) |
*>Neo No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::Thanks, but there does seem to be a problem with it; at least for me, the Game(s) section now never shows up anymore even when filled out ([[Magoo]] for instance used to have one which is now gone, and it's gone on the Blipper example too), and neither does the Latest Game one for some reason :\ --[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 20:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks, but there does seem to be a problem with it; at least for me, the Game(s) section now never shows up anymore even when filled out ([[Magoo]] for instance used to have one which is now gone, and it's gone on the Blipper example too), and neither does the Latest Game one for some reason :\ --[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 20:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
I hope you don't mind me messing with the template, but I believe the #if functions were breaking it, and don't think they are really needed at all, seeing how the other sections don't use them and still don't show up unless filled in. Looking at the template's history, the reason the automatic hiding didn't work for the Game(s) section seems to have been because of the <nowiki><small></small></nowiki> code, which made the Wiki think that the section was filled in even if it wasn't. Sorry if I messed up anything, though I cannot see anything wrong with the articles using the template at the moment...--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 13:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | I hope you don't mind me messing with the template, but I believe the #if functions were breaking it, and don't think they are really needed at all, seeing how the other sections don't use them and still don't show up unless filled in. Looking at the template's history, the reason the automatic hiding didn't work for the Game(s) section seems to have been because of the <nowiki><small></small></nowiki> code, which made the Wiki think that the section was filled in even if it wasn't. Sorry if I messed up anything, though I cannot see anything wrong with the articles using the template at the moment...--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 13:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Not at all! If we didn't want anyone messing with it, it would've been protected :P That's the awesome thing about wikis: You're free to edit as you please (provided you make edits that destroy!) Not sure if it fixed the problem, but if it did, then thank you! If it didn't, I'll give it a look later. Thanks again for your contributions!{{:User:Neo/sig}} 20:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | |||