|
|
| (466 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {| class="navbox" style="border:5px solid #{{WKColor1}}; background-color: #{{WKColor1.5}}; width:100%; -moz-border-radius: 15px; border-radius: 15px, khtml-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px;"
| | <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. -->__NOTOC__{{FPRules}} |
| |<center><span style="color:#{{WKColor6}};font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;font-size:Large"><big>'''Featured Picture Nomination'''</big></span></center>
| | |
| |-
| | ='''<small>Current Nominations</small>'''= |
| |<big><center>'''What a Featured Picture is:'''</center></big>
| |
| |-
| |
| |
| |
| # A good, Kirby-related image.
| |
| # A properly licensed image.
| |
| # An image up to WiKirby's [[WiKirby:Quality Standards|Quality Standards]].
| |
| # A highly detailed image with great resolution.
| |
| |-
| |
| |<big><center>'''Voting Regulations'''</center><big>
| |
| |-
| |
| |
| |
| # Voting is currently open to all editors. (Standard may change if abuse is suspected.)
| |
| # All votes '''''MUST''''' be signed with your signature (type four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.)) Unsigned votes are automatically negated, regardless of any points made.
| |
| # Supporting arguments consisting of "I like this image!" "It's cool!" etc. will be negated. Arguments must make note of why the image deserves to be featured. Opposing arguments are treated likewise, and may not consist of "This picture is lame," "I don't like this picture," etc.
| |
| # An image will become automatically featured if it receives ten (10) valid votes to support it.
| |
| # After eight (8) weeks of being nominated, a difference of supporting/opposing votes will decide an image's fate. If most are supportive, the image will be featured.
| |
| # An image will fail to become featured if it receives five (5) valid oppositions.
| |
| # There may be no more than six (6) nominated images at one time. Do not add any more that this.
| |
| # You may NOT vote to support anything you've nominated, and you may NOT vote twice to support an image.
| |
| # Please add all oppositions/supports on a new line beginning with a pound sign (#) to automatically create an alphanumeric list.
| |
| # Staff members reserve the right to negate any votes without notification of the voter if they are found to be in violation of any of these rules.
| |
| # Staff members will not be allowed to moderate the vote for anything they have largely contributed to.
| |
| |}
| |
| ='''<small>Current nominations</small>'''= | |
| <!-- PLEASE EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | | <!-- PLEASE EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| | ''None at the moment.'' |
| | =='''<small>Occasional Nominations</small>'''== |
| | {{main|WiKirby:Featured Picture Nomination/Occasional}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Kirby' Epic Yarn== | | ==Nomination Archive== |
| [[File:Kirby KEY.png|right|200px]]
| | {{Large|[[WiKirby:Featured Picture Nomination/Archive|Featured Pictures]]}}</br> |
| It fits the standards perfectly.-- [[User:Ember Incubus|կրակ]] <sup><sup>([[User Talk:Ember Incubus|խոսել]])</sup></sup> --
| | {{Large|[[WiKirby:Featured Picture Nomination/Failed Archive|Failed Nominations]]}} |
| {{Support}} | | {{clear}} |
| I love this picture! It's Kirby like we've never seen him before. The design is bold, radical, shows that the developers are going all-out with this theme in Epic Yarn.
| | {{Navbox-Help}} |
| {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 13:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)<br>
| |
| Well, this is an amazing image, great quality, it is striking, innovative, I like it. --[[User:Tucayo|Tucayo]] 17:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Since 64, there had been NO home consoles, but I had all the home consoles that the Kirby home consoles appeared in, and that means you, [[SNES]]! Back on topic, I love how Kirby can be but into MANY textures, and this is one of them. Good quality, everything a known Nintendo charactor should have. --[[User:KirJoey|Joey]]
| |
| | |
| {{Oppose}}
| |
| | |
| | |
| {{Neutral}} | |
| | |
| ==Tree in Whispy Woods==
| |
| [[File:KDL WhispyWoods.png|right|300px]]
| |
| It follows all the requirements of the Featured Picture and is a neat pic. --[[User:Sixeightyseventyone|68071]] [[User talk:Sixeightyseventyone|(talk)]] [[Special:Random|22:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)]]
| |
| | |
| {{support}} | |
| | |
|
| |
|
| {{oppose}}
| | [[Category:Featured content voting]] |
| #The image looks very bland, especially compared to later artwork. Very few (and dark) colours, no shading at all and generally lacking in detail (the fruit are just circles) and eye-catching features.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 15:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
| | [[Category:Featured content]] |
| #The image is colorless and doesn't catch the feel of Whispy Woods. -- [[User:Ember Incubus|կրակ]] <sup><sup>([[User Talk:Ember Incubus|խոսել]])</sup></sup> -- 23:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| #I agree. Its coloring is really dark. [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[Crash|wig]] [[Wheel|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 00:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| #It WAY too dull, with just 4 colors, dull brown, dull green, dull red and black. I also agree to the other 3's coments. 0%shading, 1.02%detail, 0% eye-catching features and 100% blandness.[[User:Meta Knite|Meta]] [[Meta Knight|Knite]] ([[User talk:Meta Knite|talk]])--5:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| # I agree with everything said above. It's just not as colourful, as vibrant, or as detailed as many of the other images out there. We need something brighter on the Main Page. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 21:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| #Per all. With 2 words I can describe this: TOO DULL. But it has good coloring, though. --[[User:KirJoey|Joey]]
| |
| {{neutral}}
| |
