Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

Category talk:Enemies in Kirby 64: The Crystal Shards

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Delete/Keep?[edit]

This is currently the only category that categorises enemies by game; this used to be "necessary" for Kirby 64 as it had no navigation template, but as I just created one (Template:Kirby64), this should technically not be needed anymore once the template has been placed in the respective articles. If, however, people think that the wiki would profit from enemies being categorised by game in addition to having the navigation templates, we could likewise force this standard on enemies from all games. The situation should not in any case remain the way it currently is, however; we either need to standardise this way of enemy categorising or get rid of it completely. There's no logic in having only one of these categories.--Vellidragon 12:04, 12 July 2011 (CDT)

I am in support of Keep and making it standard. I am aware that that there are multiple ways people like to surf a wiki, and having both a navbox and a category will allow for that. :). Tacopill 14:38, 12 July 2011 (CDT).
Seems logical to me, and we're already categorising levels/stages by game, so it makes sense to do the same for other types of articles. Could probably place all the game-specific categories in "Category:[game name]" categories as well, in addition to grouping them by article type; e.g. "Levels in Kirby's Dream Land 2" could be in "Category:Levels" and "Category:Kirby's Dream Land 2", which would include all Kirby's Dream Land 2 related categories as well as the game's article. Still going to wait if other people have anything to say on this before beginning to take action, though.--Vellidragon 14:47, 12 July 2011 (CDT)
I say make it standard. --Moydow 23:11, 12 July 2011 (CDT)
Alright. I do agree with this as well, so that's three people who do. Looking at the sparse userbase, I guess a consensus of three should be enough to justify taking action (and this is probably the most discussion this is going to get even if I leave it unresolved for longer), so I'll get started on this. For consistency's sake, we should probably do the same for other things as well, like items and bosses.--Vellidragon 21:21, 13 July 2011 (CDT)
Sounds good. Happy to of participated. Tacopill 15:15, 14 July 2011 (CDT).