Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
WiKirby:Featured Article Nomination/Unfeature: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Superbound (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
#This one only has 1 construction notice, but that's still bad, and there is, of course, rule 5. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | #This one only has 1 construction notice, but that's still bad, and there is, of course, rule 5. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | ||
#Construction means the article is incomplete. Incomplete articles should not be considered featured, because they do not reflect the wiki's best. Supporting its removal. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | #Construction means the article is incomplete. Incomplete articles should not be considered featured, because they do not reflect the wiki's best. Supporting its removal. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. [[User:Superbound|Superbound]] ([[User talk:Superbound|talk]]) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
#Yes. It has 2 construction notices, which is probably not a good think for a featured article. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | #Yes. It has 2 construction notices, which is probably not a good think for a featured article. {{unsigned|Cowguy}} | ||
#See my vote on Waddle Doo, but it's even worse here. Definitely not a good pick for featurement, and it baffles me how this was ever deemed good. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | #See my vote on Waddle Doo, but it's even worse here. Definitely not a good pick for featurement, and it baffles me how this was ever deemed good. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
#Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. [[User:Superbound|Superbound]] ([[User talk:Superbound|talk]]) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} |
Revision as of 18:28, 12 May 2020
|
|
Current Nominations
Waddle Doo (May 9th, 2020 - May 23, 2020)
Well, since it's under construction, which violates rule 5 of being featured... ---PinkYoshiFan 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Support
- This one only has 1 construction notice, but that's still bad, and there is, of course, rule 5. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowguy (talk • contribs) . Please always sign your comments by typing ~~~~!
- Construction means the article is incomplete. Incomplete articles should not be considered featured, because they do not reflect the wiki's best. Supporting its removal. --YFJ (talk · edits) 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. Superbound (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Waddle Dee (May 9th, 2020 - May 23, 2020)
Since it's (also) under construction, which violates rule 5 or being featured... ---PinkYoshiFan 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Support
- Yes. It has 2 construction notices, which is probably not a good think for a featured article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowguy (talk • contribs) . Please always sign your comments by typing ~~~~!
- See my vote on Waddle Doo, but it's even worse here. Definitely not a good pick for featurement, and it baffles me how this was ever deemed good. --YFJ (talk · edits) 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Per Pinkyoshifan, Cowguy and YoshiFlutterJump. Superbound (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral