Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
Template talk:Infobox-Enemy: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
*>Kingofun |
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I've noticed issues with the infoboxes too. I'll look for the ones Adam has fixed and see what I can do. Edit: I've lessened the problem by copying the mark up Adam put in the Items infobox, and am thinking to create new fields to break up the Games section, such as Debut and Latest, as you've suggested. And will try having the others appear in a field below those two and in small text to minimize the intrusion. I'm a fan of infoboxes listing all of the games something appeared in.If say I don't see Game A in the infobox for Enemy B, then I can tell immediately some information may be missing from the page. But if it still looks bad, I'll nix it. [[User:Axiomist|Axiomist]] 22:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | :I've noticed issues with the infoboxes too. I'll look for the ones Adam has fixed and see what I can do. Edit: I've lessened the problem by copying the mark up Adam put in the Items infobox, and am thinking to create new fields to break up the Games section, such as Debut and Latest, as you've suggested. And will try having the others appear in a field below those two and in small text to minimize the intrusion. I'm a fan of infoboxes listing all of the games something appeared in.If say I don't see Game A in the infobox for Enemy B, then I can tell immediately some information may be missing from the page. But if it still looks bad, I'll nix it. [[User:Axiomist|Axiomist]] 22:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:It looks much better now! Thanks for the change![[User:Kingofun|Kingofun]] 02:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | :It looks much better now! Thanks for the change![[User:Kingofun|Kingofun]] 02:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
<br clear=all> | |||
==Game(s) Section== | |||
In the Blipper example above, only the games that are not the debut or latest appearance are listed in the Game(s) section. So if an enemy has only appeared in one game (like [[Sasuke]]), would that game be listed as debut and latest and the Game(s) section left completely empty? It looks a bit odd that way imo, as there is clearly a game listed as Debut Game and Latest Game but the section for games below those is empty. Maybe the Game(s) section should not appear at all if it doesn't contain anything, like the other sections?--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 19:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 5 May 2010
Infobox
Can't we change games to debut? Its much better and it wont be as cluttered as this -
| ||||||||||||||
|
Kingofun 06:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've noticed issues with the infoboxes too. I'll look for the ones Adam has fixed and see what I can do. Edit: I've lessened the problem by copying the mark up Adam put in the Items infobox, and am thinking to create new fields to break up the Games section, such as Debut and Latest, as you've suggested. And will try having the others appear in a field below those two and in small text to minimize the intrusion. I'm a fan of infoboxes listing all of the games something appeared in.If say I don't see Game A in the infobox for Enemy B, then I can tell immediately some information may be missing from the page. But if it still looks bad, I'll nix it. Axiomist 22:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- It looks much better now! Thanks for the change!Kingofun 02:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Game(s) Section
In the Blipper example above, only the games that are not the debut or latest appearance are listed in the Game(s) section. So if an enemy has only appeared in one game (like Sasuke), would that game be listed as debut and latest and the Game(s) section left completely empty? It looks a bit odd that way imo, as there is clearly a game listed as Debut Game and Latest Game but the section for games below those is empty. Maybe the Game(s) section should not appear at all if it doesn't contain anything, like the other sections?--Vellidragon 19:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)