Talk:Master Crown
Split[edit]
Alright, bad move on my part to do this as the article gets featured, but I have mentioned this a couple times before but I never kicked this discussion off.
As of right now, this page talks about two different things, the object and the boss. It's messy, and I don't like it. The crown and boss look completely different, and have completely different things to talk about. I propose the whole "as a boss" section to be moved to its own page (and anything related to the boss specifically like screenshots, trivia points and the like). Since we do that with boss forms such as Magolor (second form) and Drawcia Soul, I don't see how it's any different, mostly when recently we created Traitor Magolor for almost the same purpose as a boss page for the Master Crown would have. Thoughts? - Gigi (talk • edits) 20:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
I'm good with a split. Makes sense to me. Waddlez3121 (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also support a split for the stated reasons. StarPunch (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, but then would that mean that the boss (article) would have to be featured after the object's article? (Not saying that I disagree, just wondering.) --Paistrie (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can see why splitting it by object and boss would be good since they're so different, although the boss does have the same name as the object in this case (same deal as Magolor and Magolor (second form) though). As for feature status, I'm not sure how that transfers with splitting. ---PinkYoshiFan 20:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think when splitting, the new page shouldn't be featured but I would say it could be a candidate for featuring soon after the split. I don't think it should be by default though, as it has happened before that featured pages let split off and the new pages aren't quite ready (see Kirby's characteristics). - Gigi (talk • edits) 11:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm entirely neutral on the topic of splitting but agree that featuring should not be default. ShadowKirby (t/c) a.k.a. your new overlord ShadowMagolor 12:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support the split. I think neither of the two articles should be featured, but they could be allowed to be nominated immediately. Superbound (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm entirely neutral on the topic of splitting but agree that featuring should not be default. ShadowKirby (t/c) a.k.a. your new overlord ShadowMagolor 12:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think when splitting, the new page shouldn't be featured but I would say it could be a candidate for featuring soon after the split. I don't think it should be by default though, as it has happened before that featured pages let split off and the new pages aren't quite ready (see Kirby's characteristics). - Gigi (talk • edits) 11:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can see why splitting it by object and boss would be good since they're so different, although the boss does have the same name as the object in this case (same deal as Magolor and Magolor (second form) though). As for feature status, I'm not sure how that transfers with splitting. ---PinkYoshiFan 20:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, but then would that mean that the boss (article) would have to be featured after the object's article? (Not saying that I disagree, just wondering.) --Paistrie (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
If nobody's opposed, I'll go ahead and split it to Master Crown (boss) soon (with this article featured and that one not). ---PinkYoshiFan 13:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
That sounds good. --Paistrie (talk) 15:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
